Monday, October 29, 2007

NYT UNouts Dumbledore!!

Believe it or not (for those of you who wondered why Dumbledore's sexuality matters!) New York Times cultural critic Edward Rothstein declares that perhaps JK Rowling didn't know her own character that well, and that maybe he's NOT gay. Here's the Galleycat for those who can't wait to hear more.


writtenwyrdd said...

The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

Cheryl said...

Hmm... I think I will use that expression now. Never heard of a tempest in a teapot.

It's interesting to debate how much control an author can/does/should have over work that has been released to the world. But I'm sure we've all heard that whole debate before. So I'll just skip it.